I've not heard anyone address Nokia's claim that because Judge Luckern's decision against Nokia's arbitration had not been rendered (approved?) by the full ITC, the decision was NOT YET a fact and conclusion of law. Thus, Nokia claims that there was no collateral estoppel. Any validity to this claim?
[I must be getting good - I spelled 'collateral estoppel' correctly on the first try. Where do I put up my law degree. LOL]
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
