News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Mr. Bill

04/05/08 12:06 AM

#172133 RE: TEX #172131

ATurd was never about "helping" clients out with GVRP. It was all a scam. They were planning to force those who sold to buy back and were relying on what they heard from the company.

Hence the "you can sell but not buy back" viewpoint.

They told people they had their shares and could sell, people said place my order for 1 billion at .0001, 5 seconds later you heard "you got a fill for 2 million shares ($200) hope you don't have a problem". What do you mean? Well if the shares don't get delivered then you will need to buy them back. Well buy me 2M at .0002 then so I dont have a problem (and I will take a $200 loss). Sorry we cannot do that, we are not allowing opening positions in GVRP at this time.

Go ask Taki. Go check the "I sold my shares at Ameritrade" thread.

ATurd was stuck because they had delivered IOU shares and were right in the middle of the mess.

They had no vested interests for the clients and never have.

That was their play but things did not go as they had hoped.

MAYBE THEY SHOULD ASK THEM WHY IT WAS DIFFERENT FOR GVRP!

icon url

Zardiw

04/12/08 8:42 PM

#172759 RE: TEX #172131

MXSV. Action pending?

Mr. xxxxx,

Thanks for your patience in awaiting my reply. We have delivered communication to Matrix Energy Services Corporation (MXSV) and are currently awaiting a firm response. If we do not hear back from that group we will evaluate our options and possibly notify the SEC of a Rule 10b-17 violation.

This is the point at which we cannot provide any further information on the investigation. While I cannot guarantee you will receive your shares (we can only pay out shares we receive from the issuer), or that the SEC will take any action, please be assured your complaint has hit its mark and prompted us to take further action.

Best regards,

Virginia Magnuson
Senior Research Analyst
Office of the President
TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation


z