Replies to post #172120 on The Golden Lounge

[Stock]

The real point with TDAmeritrade is this -- why do they want to risk sanctions from FINRA for not following broker/dealer regulations?

They want to work with slimeball attorneys and break the law?

Is this a company policy?

Can they email you the company policy that says that corporate entity legal representation now has the authority to overrule Federal law, and their role is to collaborate with these slimeballs?

[Buckey]

OH lets not ever for once think the brokers are on our side - THEY ARE NOT. GVRP is classic example

[Zardiw]

What the hell is this???: a final judgment was entered by consent against Kirschner, permanently enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder,


So they told him that it was BAD to break the law and to not DO that again.......hmmmmm I always thought that was UNDERSTOOD, and that if you BROKE the law, you get punished....at least that's how I THOUGHT it worked. I guess it only applies to us poor schmucks, and not to anybody that wears a suit and has a law degree.....z

[Mr. Bill]

In China the whole lot would have been executed. There they have very strict rules and regulations and follow them to a T. They had several folks who had insider trader violations. They offered to give all the money back and more. Nope. The penalty handed down was death. A few folks got life in prison with no parole.

In the USA the SEC rewards them.

No, it was $55K and the return of sales of 20,000 shares or so.

His buddies who sold the other 118,000 shares as insiders got to keep their fraudulently acquired gains.

A fish rots from the head down.

[Rocketred]

sold 19,500 well who sold the rest of the paper in another USA cover up scam

that was only 5.8 billion short shares