InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chipotle_pickle

04/02/04 4:50 PM

#275 RE: Rager #274

Matt's almost spot on.

The 10-15X conventional generators is a good estimate, in-line with the Whitepaper that HYVR pulled. Why they pulled it is anybody's guess.

About Terra Nova, the conjecture is that they will ever get a reactor at all. HYER had a LOA before, but it fell through.

The real fun should be when the annual report comes out later this month. It will show how much they got for the brine or sludge they sold to the recycler. When the investors see that the revenue from the sale of the by-product I speculate that some of them will feel let down.



icon url

mattg3663

04/03/04 12:46 AM

#296 RE: Rager #274

Rager accuses me of being a basher, but I'm only stating the facts. Have a look at the the "Stock or Shlock" page of penny stock consumer watchdog stockpatrol.com's site at

http://www.stockpatrol.com/schlock/toc.html

If you scroll down the "Radar's Doghouse" section, which highlights scam stocks, you will find HYVR. Why would they put them there? Well, you need not look further than these other 4 pages on their site, which add supporting info on why they have determined HYVR should be in the "doghouse".

http://www.stockpatrol.com/schlock/articles/energycrisis3.html
http://www.stockpatrol.com/schlock/doghouse/hydro2.html
http://www.stockpatrol.com/schlock/articles/energycrisis3s2.html
http://www.stockpatrol.com/schlock/doghouse/hydro3.html

I would like to challenge Rager to find analysis from a reputable third-party source to counter these reports. I would be shocked if he could find a single independent site that contradicts them.