News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Traderfan

02/18/08 7:23 PM

#42192 RE: defireman #42191

Yes it could very well be triple the amount of before. At least double. But I still don't realize why you are caring for every million new shares here while you don't care too much for a couple of hundred million on your other stock. That is what I don't get. You bash Huppe because you say he is selling us down with his new shares but you don't mention this fact on another board. That is weird. We had heavy selling there lately. More than heavy. Dilution big time! But that all is no problem for you.

I mean I'm in both stocks because despite the huge o/s I find the other one still attractive with their product but obviously they need to do 10 times the business what EFFC needs to do in the future to gain the same dollar amount per share. More than 10 times so not sure why you are so extremely focused to discredit EFFC. It makes no sense when you are at the same time invested in a stock with 12 times the o/s.

I hope you get my point. I mean I'm the last one who doesn't agree that we have to get rolling here with the product and the sales and I too was critical lately here but I can't see your point in bashing the rather very low o/s here for a company on the pinkies.

I know you are always quick to tell me that we should just wait for EFFC to triple or quadruple the o/s but let's be correct here. A couple of months we had 127 million o/s and you said the same and now we have 119 million so at least there is no evidence that they give out shares as if there is no tommorrow. The facts just don't show this and I would say you should be fair if you don't have a problem with 1.6 billion o/s you shouldn't have a problem with 119 million. Right?

icon url

Barren Realms 007

02/18/08 7:31 PM

#42193 RE: defireman #42191

I am not sure I have been invloved in other things for the last few months and I am just now bringing my attention back to this and getting reinvolved. I will see if we can find something out and get it posted on the board if there are any changes. I am sure there are things in the box that need to be updated and these will be addressed and taken care of as soon as possible. I can promise things will be looked at more attentively and post will be more closely monitored. So have paitence with the new moderators as we work things out. This is not to say that the past moderators have not done a great job under the circumstances.

Is there a reason why the float figure is from Nov 07? We are already in mid-Feb 2008.

The float could have tripled and no one would know any better.