No, there was not a proxy sent out to all which makes it illegal to start. The only people who may have gotten proxies were the ones holding their certificates.
The only people most likely holding their certificates would be most likely insiders who were issued super preferred shares.
Those shares were never voted upon by share holders and hence illegal or non existant or unauthorized, or any other adjective you would like to use that says they are worthless in this capacity.
If you purchased shares directly, then they might have been issued illegal or unauthorized shares. I would check into that if I were you.
Either way, there is absolutely no legal basis for Lanza to currently prove his shares are valid much less outnumbering the amount of shares behind the new board.
And, I'm sorry, but you can't hold an illegal board meeting, vote in your own preferred shares, and then claim majority. Because if that is the case, what say we all go in on Google and take it over?
Anyone?
Also, who did you speak to in Delaware that said this meeting is legal?
Who does the state of Delaware report as the current board of directors for BDGR?
Is Lanza even listed as an officer of the company in Delaware? And if not, then what authority gave him power to hold a board meeting to re-elect himself onto the BDGR board?
Do you really expect people to believe what you stated here without any additional facts presented?
By the way Vetguy, 15 days and counting and no documentation to support your claims against the validity of the new board and their ultimate intentions for the share holders.
Still respectfully waiting...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
