revlis, yes, I agree. It could something like what one of the IDCC's lawyer said about Samsung going in circles with the process (aribtrate, appeal, re-arbitrate, re-appeal...) in the SDNY hearing. That would lay it out flat for any untrained eyes (however, the judge can see through this even without IDCC's explanation).
These thieves should be made accountable for the IDCC's loss of business (or slowing down of licensing efforts) and the share price in turn.
-vg_future