News Focus
News Focus
icon url

enemem

11/28/07 9:53 AM

#14174 RE: neuroinv #14167

I agree about the kvetching part. You could improve things if you'd make your comments less derogatory and personal. I read this board for information, and find that the personal attacks definitely get in the way of the exchange of information.

Just because I disagree with someone doesn't make them a jerk.
icon url

ombowstring

11/28/07 12:55 PM

#14198 RE: neuroinv #14167

Neuro, I'd be very interested in your speculations re the questions you brought up in your post #14167:

Is the RD indication for real, with real potential value? Is the trial design one which is likely to work, and if it doesn't, what then? To what degree are Ampakines as a class viewed negatively by the FDA--or not? What will Schering-Plough do? What are the industry trends for partnerships and indications, and what do they augur for Cortex, if anything? How much clout does R&R have in trying to force a sale on the cheap?

One more question I have for you -- What do you think the level of partnership interest in Cortex is among bigger pharmaceutical companies at this time and if the RD and AD trials yield good results?

P.S. Let's hope this sudden burst of acrimony between you and gfp blows over quickly and is soon forgotten.
icon url

ggg7ggg

11/29/07 2:28 PM

#14225 RE: neuroinv #14167

Neuro,
I understand your frustration. But I hope that you will continue to post. You are the reason that I feel ok with Cortex - disappointed yes - and reasonably positive about its future (easy from $0.49 I suppose :-> ).

In any event, I sincerely appreciate your thoughtful, informative and balanced posts.