Replies to post #94463 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[mide]

Sam. "Does being guilty of what he is charged with make everything -- all documents and records he possesses false? -- I don't think so."

You are absolutely correct.

What is missing is the counter letter to those claims.

The WHOLE context.

Hadn't you noticed that Joe did that a lot?

Just as, what you claim as absolute has not been balanced with facts. The company has told me they have current coverage under a new policy....which I previously posted. As a shareholder, have you gotten on the horn to verify this with any one of the 7 identified employees I told you that work there? Or are they going to lie to you while under an SEC investigation?


m

[pokestake]

Sam, I didn't say everything was false, I said everything may be called into question in light of the SEC's accusations. I then went on to state an opinion that allowed for the possibility that it was not false. Your opinion in that regard is yours to keep.

Generally speaking, I see an imbalance in the rigor that you apply to those whose actions are the object of your criticisms as compared with the rigor that you apply to the actions of those who may support your criticsms.

Not the work of an impartial judge, if that is what you wish to be.