Replies to post #15433 on One Voice Technologies, Inc. (fka OVOE)

[Ugo22]

Look at the flowcharts and tell me how googles VR patent plans to access the data faster and more efficiently than ONEV's patented technology illustrates via those 2 referenced patents.

I would enjoy a true tech persons view/opinion on the flow charts from Googles VR & search Patents and the ONEV patents referenced in Google recent VR patent.

When I first studied ONEV as a company I investigated the, at the time, pending patents and their design. It reminded me of how a google search gets me what I want in spite of an ensuing onslaught of advertising.

Technology took a 2 or 3 year nap over digital rights, security, etc... ONEV did not the moved forward evry day and every year. IRIS, MCC V3, One Voice Tunes, Say to play and more are the proof.

I have always likened ONEV's patented approach to VR as being similiar to the rapid google search success. Why? Because ONEV was not trying to reinvent the wheel its just a better hub.

Its fast, accurate and requires no training to command and control in a variety of environments.
India's various dialect's, spanish, english, accents...... pose problems ONEV command and control VR solves. Name me on product that has that universality, just one.

[Iris_F]

gr8move, you are correct. Let's hope we get some solid guidance as to what is going on in the 10Q. With supposedly TELMEX, MTNL, Intel's UMPC and MID around the corner the pps says, so what? I hope ONEV's past isn't holding down ONEV's future?! GLTY

[venomen2002]

That is exactly what I said..
If Onev's patent wasn't significant and close to theirs it wouldn't have been referrenced..and that is why Onev put that info out...veno

[jerzybondon]

gr8move, thank you for clearing it up.

[ihubposter]

Slight modification. The inclusion of prior art is not to ensure that you are not INFRINGING on someone else's patent, but, rather, to enable the patent examiner to determine whether your proposed invention represents an advancement over other inventions, or, put another way, whether your proposed invention, and in light of such prior art, would have been "obvious" to one skilled in the art.