Replies to post #32974 on Effective Control Transport Inc. (fka EFFC)

[rosebud05]

What you can turn off engine of trucks in question but you cannot turn off the manual control of airplanes? What's the difference? Very little. Beautiful no, DWP? Did not think of all the ramifications? Little short sighted no? Common on board as the train is about to take off.

[Jenny_Garner]

DWP, why don't you get over it? This company will be successful with or without your constant picking on them. It may take a while and there might be some more weeks with a low share price but in the end this will be a real burner. Like it or not, it's up to you.

They have something and it will only take some more time. Period.

[rosebud05]

DWP, I guess you still do not understand the power of FOLO. Yes. FOLO can detect/track object in question and in case of deviancy from its route of origin (or any other pre-determined criteria) can alert the national security who can simply turn off the manual control (just like it can turn off trucks) and turn on the autopilot. The technology is built in already with very little need for modification for the specific industry. The genius of FOLO and Raphael Huppe!

I don't believe it. If it was true then Raphael should get employees working on it instead of talking about it. Supposedly Raphael produced a DB system, and a security system. Now the GENIUS (LOL!) controls airplanes also.

What do you mean? You mean you can turn off truck engine but you cannot turn off manual control of an airplane? What is the big difference? Of course, there is none. You probably still do not believe that airplanes have automatic piloting. Which is more difficult to believe for you--that there is automatic piloting capacity in airplanes or that one switch can turn off manual control?

Remember, that is the beauty of FOLO. It allows for upto 8 Input/6 Output inputs of your liking so you can monitor and control just about anything in any vehicle. Wow!!

Just the fact that FOLO can prevent 9-11 again or any hijacking seems a must for all airplanes from now on. You veer off course and do not respond to control tower, just turn off manual control and go automatic. You think homeland security is not interested? How about being able to control trucks entering highly sensitive areas that could be targets for islamofascistsfreakazoidsociopathiclunaticmartyrsforthedevilcreeps , such as being able to turn off all engine of unauthorized vehicles entering say 3 mile radius of nuclear power plants,et c...

[rosebud05]

I will repeat my question DWP. It's a simple question which you have not answered. Which technology do you think is easier to develop. A autopiloting program in airplanes that can fly and land the airplane in any airport in us without manual control or a switch that turns manual control over to autopilot.

Looks like you recently stated that I was saying that FOLO could auto pilot cars based on the above question. Was that honest? Looks like you have lots of lifetime bans on people who disagrees with you. Interesting.

Common, please educate us and answer the question. Is it harder for you to believe that airplane can pilot itself or to believe that a remote switch can turn things on and off? Seems simple enough. Waiting.

[rosebud05]

FOLO has the capacity to input 8 different data and 6 output data as it currently stands. That means that any information in the digital format can be received, processed and spit back out in any digital command. Just think of the possibilities. You can be as creative as you want with this technology.