You are totally incorrect --
I merely want all shareholders (and potential shareholders) to have as much knowledge as possible. You can say that Joe M is biased and I will not argue that point with you. I would merely say that you also are biased.
jfburk, I then would say to you that nothing I post could, as you put it, "destroy" this company. The actions of past management over the years plus current management are the ones who have damaged this company to the point where it's very survival is in question. And please, don't try that "current management (Lienwand) is new as he has been with this company for a number of years.
Now, the following, from a post I did yesterday, is why I want to keep all information and facts available:
We want any possible new investors to know that the company chooses not to disseminate information publicly -- via PRs/NRs -- but rather, chooses to have IR communicate with a small number of "chosen" shareholders via phone calls, emails and private lunches -- wouldn't any/all fair minded individuals want that information available to everyone?????
We want any possible new investors to know that the company has made dozens and dozens and dozens of promises over the years and has yet to deliver on a single one which has benefitted loyal shareholders -- wouldn't any/all fair minded individuals want that information available to everyone?????
We want any possible new investors to learn to question anything/everything and learn not to be satisfied with promises but rather to demand results -- wouldn't any/all fair minded individuals recommend that?????
We want any possible new investors to much much better informed than any who preceded them -- wouldn't any/all fair minded individuals recommend that?????