Replies to post #91189 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[siriuslyricher]

Maybe he's as "confused" as Vern once was about that alleged dismissal:

Posted by: siriuslyricher
In reply to: siriuslyricher who wrote msg# 85551 Date:8/28/2007 2:18:40 PM
Post #of 91191

Vern, you misinterpreted the ruling.

This is the link to the docket report.

http://www.miami-dadeclerk.com/civil/docketinfo.asp?pCase_Year=2007&pCase_Seq=20439&pCase_Co....

The ruling is a “Denying Order Showing Cause Etc” - the judge denied GlobeTel's motion on the Court's Order to Show cause only with regard to Trimax. The Order to Show Cause would have given GlobeTel immediate rights to take back the equipment.

It was denied on jurisidictional grounds; the judge said GlobeTel should have brought the action against Trimax (not Uli) in Collier County . The lawsuit remains pending and has not been dismissed.

My guess is that it will end up like the hangar suit, i.e., it will be settled between the parties.