for the record you might tell that your two laywer friends are also invested in CBAY, so their opinion isn't an objective one.
sooooooo you want an opinion from someone we can trust that isn't invested in CBAY ??? I was already expecting you so I did PM another friend . . . ever hear of JANICE SHELL ??? hehe NEXT !!!
It's hard to say. The case was definitely dismissed. Oddly, though, it's still listed as active. Not enough information. At a guess, though, I'd say CBAY is out of it, one way or another. They may have settled privately, though if they did you may never find out.
File Msg | Remove Msg | *Private* Reply
Block janice shell's Private Messages Add janice shell to Favorites
In Reply To: Go to this message Sent By: lets dodis Date: 10/12/2007 3:14:40 PM Hey janice,
I know you're busy these days but, would you be so kind as to look at this and tell me if cal-bay (CBAY) was dismissed or not. . . is this guys post correct ??
THANKS VERRRRRRY MUCH !!!!!
Posted by: Wick In reply to: keymaster who wrote msg# 30740 Date:10/12/2007 12:23:47 PM Post #of 30760
Well the defendant in this case is CAl BAY... So if they were dismissed then thats great means only pawson is left in that one....
this is how it read looks as though the case was dismissed to me.... it does not say a defendant or plaintiff was dsmissed just judgement dismissed.....
Case 07-A-541806-B Status ACTIVE Plaintiff Granite Pointe Equity Investments LLC Attorney Polednak, Donald T. Defendant Cal-Bay International Inc Attorney ## Unknown ## Judge Denton, Mark R. Dept. 13 Judgment Remarks Amount Final Entered Interest Debtor Fees Creditor Costs Signed By Total Judgment 09/11/2007 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL $0.00 09/12/2007 at 11:55 AM $0.00 Multiple DEBTOR Parties $0.00 Multiple CREDITOR Parties $0.00 Denton, Mark R. $0.00 Debtor - Individual who is ordered to honor the Judgment.
Creditor - Individual who will receive benefit of the Judgment.
for the record, i am no longer in CBAY (thats not to say i won't be if this starts running) but i am never sitting in anything more then a few days. NOW that being said....I never give a legal opinion based on what i am in or not in. I read what i was sent and that was, and still is, my opinion on it ....plain and simple. no pumping, no bashing.
Keep in mind that the request to the lawyer was a legal interpretation of a document and not a personal opinion of the company. We sure have those here who don't hesitiate to impune the integrity of Mr Rizvi and others whitout even knowing them or contacting them directly. Just an observation - RTB