Sorry I couldn't understand my own post. I was in a hurry to return to work from lunch. Here it is again.
Mainuh
I know I've beaten this idea to death. I received a reply from Megas saying it was an interesting thought. He didn't go any further. The thing we need to realize is of those 525 million shares (the new outstanding) half and I believe it is higher are held by insiders. Megas already said that when trading resumes our brokers will need to buy from those shares to legitimize our positions. So what if, only insiders, and the legal owners of the settled court ruling of Darby shares are excluded from delivery of said dividend. Our shares are the ones needing covered, and are the bases from all appearances that the DTC won't let us trade. Again, nobody wants to cover what we never should have had settled in our accounts. And again, thats not our problem, it's now our right. Enforce the law or pay on the shares you never acquired is my position. I think it looks very legal.
BCIT announces a .19 dividend(or equal to current street value per share) to be paid to all legal shareholders
excluding Insiders and those entitled to delivery of Darby shares who are holding in their accounts(this is the trickey part) 106 cussip shares. Since the DTC hasn't released the 205's everyone is entitled to this payment by their brokers, but are not legal shareholders of BCIT. BCIT has nobody to pay because we hold shares that shouldn't have existed. We then sue our brokers for payment based on fiduciary fraud and failure. I think we would trade very soon after this announcement. All of our shares are to be made real or paid on.
If the DTC's stance is we cleared all these trades and took your money, but we didn't sell you real shares. Our stance is then you will pay on them until they are made real.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
