Mainuh I know I've beaten this idea to death with this board. I received a reply from Megas saying it was an interesting thought. He didn't go any further. The thing to realize about this is those out of those 525 millin shares (new outstanding) half and I believe it is higher are held by insiders. Megas already said that when trading begins our brokers have to buy from those shares to legitimize our positions. So what if all insiders and legal holders of Darby shares are excluded from delivery of said dividend. Our shares are the ones needing covered and are the bases from all appearances that we don't trade. Nobody wants to cover what we never should have had settled. Again thats not our problem. Enforce the law or pay on the shares you never acquired is my position. I think it looks very legal.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
