This is my last post on this subject....
1) You say that some of the stuff is 1-11/2 yrs old, and
a site like sciencedaily or medicalnewstoday posts it and
has a current timeline as well as an abstract possibly that shows currently, how am I to know that you would consider
that as old material?
2) Because you might have seen it before or are privvy(knowledgeable) on said subject, then you cannot assume that everyone else is also. I do a search to attempt to match the subject matter up with a topical post here previously fyi.
3) Do you really think that my intention would be to annoy
other posters, rather to to possibly inform them of information in the same manner that I get informed here as well? I thanked Biowatch for his informative posts(to me) this am for example. Plus I differ with you about their newsworthiness as I get PM's about the articles quite often.
If an article says Oct 2nd, what would make me think that the topic was over a year old. Sometimes the articles have added information in them like today's IDIX post. I have been here and read ad nauseum, hundreds of posts in one day about DNDN, all either the same, or kicked up a notch to some degree...
4) This is your board to moderate, so I will comply with your requests, and seek to substantiate the subject matter for
currentness and topical information...
5) have a great night. .>)
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
