News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Snackman

02/07/04 12:43 PM

#29074 RE: TREND1 #29073

Seems to me that he is accusing everyone else of a pump and dump and is setting one up for himself and his 1000s of followers. Just my opinion.
icon url

orda

02/07/04 12:45 PM

#29075 RE: TREND1 #29073

Because that's when he and his

minions will jump in to ride it back down.

icon url

Zeev Hed

02/07/04 1:37 PM

#29115 RE: TREND1 #29073

Larry, remember the "Scenario" on MU in early 2000, I got a lot of grief at the time from skeeter bug, but MU marched and passed my target it was $100 pre split) in a big way. Scenario 2 is different (the rights offering) because we run into a bear market, these massive pumps simply do not work in a bear, and since the current cyclical bull might have only 6 to 10 months to go, imto, I don't think they can get MU above $80 or so the required level to force rights redemption.
icon url

24601

02/07/04 1:57 PM

#29131 RE: TREND1 #29073

Larry Dudash: Guys that "call for an up move" should not be heard to criticize a stock as a pump-and-dump issue. Stocks are not pump-and-dumps. Stocks are pumped and dumped. And the people who do the pumping and dumping are the guys who "call for up moves" and "call for down moves." They pump. They dump. And they decry pump-and-dumps. They have followers. They preach such secret truths as "companies need to make money" and "you can't make money without revenue." Thank goodness they're willing to play pied piper here, huh?




icon url

theguvna88

02/07/04 11:24 PM

#29241 RE: TREND1 #29073

Beacause we already KNOW it is going up! It's the dump part that we find interesting (before AND after)