News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Whitewash

01/31/04 5:32 PM

#27874 RE: Whitewash #27873

CPA, The only reason I took my filter off is because you drew some attention from Snack and others who usually dont respond any longer to your antics. Now I know why they did! I'll await a response in fairness then it's back on ignore for you.
icon url

tampa123

01/31/04 5:37 PM

#27876 RE: Whitewash #27873

Whitwash - I would be more inclined to celebrate with CPA if that's your idea of censorship. It doesn't matter what CPA says. It's more a matter that he has the right to say it. Those of you who feel the need for a private community can easily do so using AOL Instant Messenger.

As for Steven as the visionary. Whether it be Peter or Steven, there's no arguing that they are both visionaries of the Wave offering. And they both do a wonderful job of evangalizing Wave's value proposition. BUT, and that's a capital but ~ That doesn't mean that they can generate revenue, and create a thriving profitable business. If every visionary could, they'd all be in charge of their companies. While most are in the beginning, at some point where sales and revenue become important as an ongoing concern, as it has now, the best person for the job of making money is not always the visionaries.

Just consider that during your judgements of who's in, and who's off your list.

T123
icon url

hawkshaw

01/31/04 5:39 PM

#27877 RE: Whitewash #27873

Bravo, Whitewash!
icon url

barge

01/31/04 7:00 PM

#27886 RE: Whitewash #27873

Whitewash--Great Post! But why put the bashers on Ignore? If you change your perspective you might be able to see them in an entertaining light. The image of a 4 foot 5 inch MR. MAGOO strutting about in heavy boots trying to terrify investors always enters my mind when skimming their posts!