News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BondGekko

01/20/04 10:04 PM

#638 RE: rooster #636

First of all you should respond to my posts so I can see you are addressing them

Second of all what are you talking about, I already told you Gore would not have attacked Iraq, but he would have taken care of Afghanistan, Iraq has nothing to do with our national security right now, it is a good idea to try to get at the root causes of terrorism, but that is still just an experiment it will take years to see if that theory is correct

Saudi Arabia, they have not even been investigated for there possible role in 9/11, do you forget that some in their government were giving money to a few of the 9/11 hijackers, Bush is so far up Saudi Arabia's ass that nothing is going to get done over there

Yeah an peace in Israel, call me when that happens, how is Libya a threat to us, ever since Reagan bombed his ass in 1986 we have not heard a peep from him
icon url

My Dime

01/20/04 11:16 PM

#642 RE: rooster #636

Rooster...you love to reply but when asked to back up one simple statement you conveniently rattle on, so I will keep this short, refrain from further pointless arguments and just address this emotional post.

"If Gore was in charge he would still be asking the U.N. if it is OK to attack Iraq. Look beyond what the news tell you Spree, look at Kadafi shacking in his boots. Saudi Arabi is finding all their terrorist and weeding them out. Palestine and Isreal will soon have peace. We may still be attacked, but now they know we will not tolerate it. We must keep Bush in office to show how the people will not tolerate it either."

If you think attacking Iraq has made us safer and all these Arab leaders are "shaking in their boots" you go on believing that. What you are really saying is give me a big hammer and we will beat that part of the world into submission.

For every terrorist the Saudi's weed out some billionaire is still working behind the scenes. And just how will Israel and the Palestine's soon have peace??? Bush militarily crushed Iraq in 6 weeks but has not stopped one settlement in three years. If he really was interested in bringing peace and democracy to the mideast he would have put pressure on Israel give up the settlements and the Palestine's to stop the crazy bombing. And listen real close, for when peace does happen....yes, it will have the Clinton peace plan all over it.

Since Bush couldn't find WMD's, or terrorists or anything else so now it is a mission to bring democracy to the area. Well, be careful what you ask for you may very have elected a new Ayatollah (sp).

You really do need to look beyond what the news tells you Rooster.