Rooster...you love to reply but when asked to back up one simple statement you conveniently rattle on, so I will keep this short, refrain from further pointless arguments and just address this emotional post.
"If Gore was in charge he would still be asking the U.N. if it is OK to attack Iraq. Look beyond what the news tell you Spree, look at Kadafi shacking in his boots. Saudi Arabi is finding all their terrorist and weeding them out. Palestine and Isreal will soon have peace. We may still be attacked, but now they know we will not tolerate it. We must keep Bush in office to show how the people will not tolerate it either."
If you think attacking Iraq has made us safer and all these Arab leaders are "shaking in their boots" you go on believing that. What you are really saying is give me a big hammer and we will beat that part of the world into submission.
For every terrorist the Saudi's weed out some billionaire is still working behind the scenes. And just how will Israel and the Palestine's soon have peace??? Bush militarily crushed Iraq in 6 weeks but has not stopped one settlement in three years. If he really was interested in bringing peace and democracy to the mideast he would have put pressure on Israel give up the settlements and the Palestine's to stop the crazy bombing. And listen real close, for when peace does happen....yes, it will have the Clinton peace plan all over it.
Since Bush couldn't find WMD's, or terrorists or anything else so now it is a mission to bring democracy to the area. Well, be careful what you ask for you may very have elected a new Ayatollah (sp).
You really do need to look beyond what the news tells you Rooster.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
