considering the fact that typoBET assumes Hy-Tech will float more shares under a CD (despite numerous notable bases to the contrary & NLion's Reg D discussion which shredded the hypoBEThesis); assumes that Hy-Tech was "evicted" from stores it opted to voluntarily scuttle (despite no supportive evidence whatsoever); & assumes that CEO Nielson unlawfully SABed his 10M option shares (despite numerous S/H attestations of direct conversations w/the CEO to the contrary & a complete lack of any supportive evidence whatsoever).
using typoBET's rebuttable presumption approach, guess it's safe to conclude that typoBET must be a felon.
is it also safe to assume that "vancouverbabe0" (after bashing HYTT for months) is now very long HYTT?!?
PS greed -- what did you do to get bounced from Panetta's BOT board? things were surprisingly tense over there recently, despite them being on a collective tear the last few weeks.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
