Replies to post #277194 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[tombrady12nh]

SLJB Reiterates Release Date of Audited Financials as November 15, 2006
Wednesday November 8, 2006 10:19 am ET


WINDSOR, ON--(MARKET WIRE)--Nov 8, 2006 -- Sulja Bros. Building Supplies Ltd. (Other OTC:SLJB.PK - News) CEO Petar Vucicevich reiterated today that the anticipated release date of the audited financial report for SLJB was in fact correct, and that the company and its management are still confident in the 11-15-2006 deadline to publish the report on their website, www.suljabros.com.
ADVERTISEMENT


Vucicevich then again thanked all those interested for their patience during the period in which the report has undergone great internal scrutiny for complete accuracy. "This will clearly define the assets of Sulja Brothers for the fiscal '06 year-end and set the standard of how our efforts will be measured in the future by our shareholders, our partners in business development, and everyone else who has peered into the 'magnifying glass' that this report has seemingly generated," stated Vucicevich.

This contains forward-looking information within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified through the use of words such as "expects," "will," "anticipates," "estimates," "believes," or statements indicating certain actions: "may," "could," "should" or "might occur." Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. The actual result may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results (expressed or implied) will not be realized.

[janniebgood]

Grande, my comment to you is that I appreciate the rationality of your thinking in the previous post, and for what it's worth, I concur with your assessment. However, to my way of thinking, the only thing that differentiates the current extension from the prior ones is that the OSC waited longer to announce it. And since none of us knows the reason for such delayed announcement, it seems presumptuous to assume that it was because the company objected. But be that as it may, we are simply back to "time will tell".

Have a great day.