News Focus
News Focus
icon url

EarnestDD

07/09/07 2:42 AM

#275927 RE: frenchy #275926

So much of Suljas supposed success with contractors and customers was based on personal relationships and great service.
Those are now gone and moved to Alberta.
icon url

Jim Bishop

07/09/07 3:02 AM

#275930 RE: frenchy #275926

Whatever...it's still a rinky dink small biz that has no good reason for being a public company.
icon url

Grande25

07/09/07 7:20 AM

#275936 RE: frenchy #275926

Thanks for the info, Frenchy. From your post history and other contributions to the board and to the i-box I believe you to be one of the few credible sources that post here.

Thanks again,

G-25
icon url

janniebgood

07/09/07 8:49 AM

#275946 RE: frenchy #275926

Why in the world wouldn't the company have left the Ontario staff in place since they are familiar with the customer base there that reportedly yielded the operation a $15+ million net profit last year? It simply makes no sense to expend a ridiculous amount of money to move the 8 core employees a distance of 2,000 miles away from their homes and families, put them up in expensive housing, and likely pay them increased wages, when the company could have simply hired local staff for the new location, who would be already familiar with similar business and have contacts in the local Calgary area. To me, none of this makes any sense at all unless the whole operation is simply "running away" from a sullied reputation brought on by themselves. And my apology in advance to any of the Sulja employees who are transferring, who were not involved in the wrongdoing perpetrated on the company's shareholders.