News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stockhound101

07/06/07 1:11 PM

#39977 RE: Jim Bishop #39974

Those 3 million are legal shorts Jim not Naked Shorts.
If the company does actually do a buy back and I have my doubts any would be short would have to cover first. if there is a large illegal short position in this then this supposed buyback would force them to cover and that may explain the large blocks being bought. Normally there wouldn't even be a bid after a PR like yesterday's. Someone IMO is seriously short or knows that the buy back is going to be canceled.
-------------------------------------------------------------
"LOL if there were any shorts, why would they cover?

There was a whole 3 million short mid June...about $39 worth of cash divvy. Bet that short was shaking in his boots...hah."
icon url

rolo731

07/07/07 12:08 AM

#40016 RE: Jim Bishop #39974

Jimbo, tell us the TRUTH. It was you who plunked down 37 grand for the 187 mil shrs, right. Hahahahahaha.......RTB