News Focus
News Focus
Followers 12
Posts 2637
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/01/2004

Re: Jim Bishop post# 39974

Friday, 07/06/2007 1:11:14 PM

Friday, July 06, 2007 1:11:14 PM

Post# of 56764
Those 3 million are legal shorts Jim not Naked Shorts.
If the company does actually do a buy back and I have my doubts any would be short would have to cover first. if there is a large illegal short position in this then this supposed buyback would force them to cover and that may explain the large blocks being bought. Normally there wouldn't even be a bid after a PR like yesterday's. Someone IMO is seriously short or knows that the buy back is going to be canceled.
-------------------------------------------------------------
"LOL if there were any shorts, why would they cover?

There was a whole 3 million short mid June...about $39 worth of cash divvy. Bet that short was shaking in his boots...hah."

there is no "objective truth"--only patterns of probability. "Matter" is seen as an illusion of the senses.
_____________________________________________________

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y