News Focus
News Focus
icon url

boogaloo

07/02/07 4:44 PM

#274325 RE: Sally77 #274324

Sally, I believe he's not a management member, per their PRs. Let's stay on the thread topic.

1) Please, explain to me how a PV lawsuit which is an "individual" lawsuit can be PR'd by a company of which he is not a member of management.

2) Or, explain to me how a PV lawsuit can be construed as a "SLJB" lawsuit, since he's not a member of SLJB management.

3) Or, explain to me how/why the PR would say "SLJB" has had its first success (re: lawsuits) and how/why a SLJB spokesperson would be able to say "we" when in fact the lawsuit is PV's (an individual).

Take your pick. I've given 3 different angles on it for you; choose the one of your liking.

Thanks in advance for your logical reply. Keep in mind the points I've made above when you answer.

** edit: Key point to the above, a lawsuit by "SLJB" against anybody is still yet to be discovered anywhere **
** Key point #2: As far as I know, the PV lawsuit has NOT been ruled on yet. Meaning, nobody has won any suit... SLJB or not. **

icon url

EarnestDD

07/02/07 5:22 PM

#274330 RE: Sally77 #274324

Sally, are you saying that you know that Petar V. is still involved with SLJB?
If so ... in what capacity?
icon url

Sally77

07/02/07 7:15 PM

#274350 RE: Sally77 #274324

How do you know he is no longer involved with SLJB?