Like when LG e-mailed me the false claim that the recent court action in Houston was a delay in the Bill Of Review hearing? I have no problem with your or his opinion. I do have a problem with what I believe is an attempt to deliberately deceive those who read this thread. Your guilty as well Bill since you posted the same assumption as the one LG claimed in his e-mail to me. A few others also have posted that ASNAP does not work and even suggested that the company's display of the technology at the shareholders' meeting was fraudulent. A meeting that I am sure that they did not attend but feel that they are certain about what really occured.