News Focus
News Focus
icon url

io_io

06/09/07 11:00 AM

#4170 RE: walldiver #4146

<<<<<"Not having any discussions with the FDA after the positive advisory panel vote strikes me as odd (no labeling discussions, no post-approval 9902B discussions?)">>>>

You can find FDA written guidance that states there is to be no clue or hint given to a sponsor as to the final decision until the letter is issued. The draft label is submitted a long time ago, and the FDA can mark up revisions in pencil, and send it to the sponsor conditionally and any-time.

I have not read it in a while, but I believe the reason given is that the decision may change as it goes up the line, or upon further review. The FDA does not reveal differences of opinions between staff, only "consensus" documents. Obviously they don't want a marginal decision to be seen to be a case on one individual over-ruling the staff. Cannot argue with that.
icon url

karunak

06/09/07 2:25 PM

#4188 RE: walldiver #4146

Was the company so naïve as to believe that an APPROVAL letter show up in the mail and it’s business as usual?

I think the answer is yes. It continued to hire a sales force and spend money.

TIA