<<Was the company so naïve as to believe that an APPROVAL letter show up in the mail and it’s business as usual?
I think the answer is yes. It continued to hire a sales force and spend money.>>
I absolutely HATE to take the opposite point of view on this, but I think to interpret DNDN's actions between the positive panel vote and the 5/9 CR letter, it is necessary to be cynical if one believes the 483 scenario has merit. Basically, if the 483 scenario as outlined in the latest lawsuit is true, then the actions that upper mgmt took all point to deliberately giving the appearance of a company that expects approval, even though the execs know they won't get it. This way, they cover up the tracks left by the 483 evidence, and can act "surprised" by the CR letter.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
