News Focus
News Focus
icon url

RockJohny

06/06/07 8:39 AM

#286 RE: antisubmarinewarfare #283

well ok!
let's get crackin and move some dirt!
icon url

burgundy

06/06/07 9:13 AM

#288 RE: antisubmarinewarfare #283

Nice!
icon url

coin_in_fountain

06/06/07 9:19 AM

#289 RE: antisubmarinewarfare #283

I wonder if this PR was a response to yesterday's steep decline. I wish they could have provided more details. I would like to know more about that air permit. Are they still going to burn natural gas, biomass, coal, or what? The last thing I heard is they were going to burn natural gas because it took too long to get a coal burning permit.

If all the permits are lined up, where's the money? How are the tax exempt bond sales going?

Do they have an EPC lined up yet to do all the construction work? If so, when are they going to start pouring concrete, and when is the scheduled completion date?

What about the other plants? How are they coming along?

I'm not trying to undercut their accomplishmenets so far. It makes my head spin to look at all these construction permits they had to obtain. They are however running behind the schedule they released last year, and they seemed to have changed course on the coal burning issue. So I'm really interested in getting a full report on what's happening, and what the new schedule is.
icon url

inxy

06/06/07 3:03 PM

#294 RE: antisubmarinewarfare #283

With all the permits involved it is a wonder that any company can get something built.

I am not against treating the environment right, but the associated costs plus the costs for all government mandated safety requirements, etc. make it difficult to compete on a global basis.