News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #667 on Biotech Values
icon url

BullNBear52

12/19/03 9:07 AM

#670 RE: DewDiligence #667

In a rush so my cut and paste was poor. It doesn't look like they did well here.

EFFICACY(0.3mg best dose) Change in linesvisual acuity
>=+3 (“improved”) 6
>= 0 33
> -3 (“stable”) 70
> -6 90

icon url

vieuxblue

12/19/03 9:11 AM

#671 RE: DewDiligence #667

Dew, I have to think that the results for Macugen that you posted are mixed. The fact that the 90% of the patients treated with Macugen lost 6 lines, vs. 78% for the placebo, doesn't look good. On the other hand, the percentages don't add up to 100%, so I am probably misreading. (See Dew's original post for a better tabular result.)

EFFICACY
(0.3mg best dose)

Change in lines
visual acuity % of Patients
at 1 year Macugen Placebo

>=+3 (“improved”) 6 2
>= 0 33 23
> -3 (“stable”) 70 55
> -6 90 78