croak, unlike yourself...I will not spew unsubstantiated rubbish to this board. I submit this professional interpretation of the importance, and relevance of Ancestry. You already are well aware of DnaPrint's leading role in the advancement of PGX.
We propose that it is not productive to continue the debate about whether racial or ethnic groups do or do not have genomic correlates. Rather, the need is to recognize that multiple, distinct concepts of race or ethnicity exist, and to move molecular epidemiologic research toward effectively characterizing and using these.
That may be the worst looking 10Q I've ever seen. I would not want to be in Dutchess' shoes - I think they are in a lot heavier than they ever thought they would be. I guess the plan is to ride this thing all the way into the ground. If I was DNAG - I might not mention the revenues from the forensics products - it's just too pathetic. Here is a clue for management: sell something, sell anything, Trace, Ellipsis, drup patents whatever... put it on e-bay, sell it for scrap metal - for god sakes do something.
You only have to read it johnny to realize it is NOT a discussion of those limitations. (Doh!)
Cherry picking quotes from out of context articles won't help you. He is on record on several occasions discussing those specific limitations and suggesting that the results of those tests need to be analyzed in a much greater context than they usually are. He offers specific examples of the misinterpretation of the results and explains the reasons for those misconceptions.
If you want to educate yourself on the subject, please feel free, but don't expect to get a rebuttal to every random quote you find.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
