News Focus
News Focus
icon url

yankee07

04/30/07 5:44 PM

#5349 RE: cameraturret #5348

57tbird did you make another bad investment.
icon url

57tbird

04/30/07 5:50 PM

#5350 RE: cameraturret #5348

Lou,

Stated Revenues were 2,482,219

Then restated to 3,216,864 to reflect Caddo lake sale.

Hence, a $734,645 increase in sales due to Caddo lake sales.

If their profit, as stated was $105,614, then it would have been 743,645 - 105,614 or a LOSS of $ 629,031 without the sale of the Caddo property. Simple Math says it all.

Their operating loss for 2006 would have been $629,031 without the sale of that Caddo lake property. You can consider EBITA, of course, but Lanza's continued misrepresentation and misleading statements continue UNABATED. And that, my friend, is not a good thing for anyone, except the Lanzas.

With Lanza funneling $1,000,000 or more into Four Star and Petrol, from BD's coffers, and any company buying BD ceased that cash cow, perhaps BD would indeed show it's profitable picture with certain clarity.




icon url

cameraturret

04/30/07 6:09 PM

#5353 RE: cameraturret #5348

57Tbird,

Do you have a motive or are you in error?

"operating income" is straight from the 9 monsths report created by Barry. Beside it and in () it says",(EBITDA).

Another report put out by Barry says that the profit from the caddo lake sale was 644,645.

If you want to argue about those figures or that term, take it up with barry. If you want to argue about the total revenue quoted, we can do that all day until the audit.

As far as the numbers shown. We have cash flow last year of $600,000 without the caddo lake sale.

Lou 781.585.7400