Replies to post #10950 on A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board (AIMUSERS)

[The Grabber]

Thanks Jack.

I think Bob Gammon is still making video copies on request of that meeting. I'm pretty sure Barry's uke solo is on there.

LD-AIM has been working out pretty well for me (see my monthly updates).

I'm very intrigued by 'HUSKY' as Don described it. As soon as he sends me the spreadsheet. I've needed to make sure that subsequent GTC Buy orders are at least 10% below the last transaction. Adding 1/2 the purchase $ to PC doesn't get you there using my formulae.

Besides, if you've been following along hereabouts, it seems on the surface to get past my symmetry issues from a few months back. So I am anxious to see it. Maybe the LD approach will work on it as well.

'Advanced Mathematics?' Here? Euler's formula? Who the hell was he? <big smile>

I'm algebraically challenged (always have been), so it is tough for me to wade through some of the posts. But I do nonetheless. I owe these guys!

So you're still 'AIMing away huh? Hows it coming along? Keep us updated every now and then.

As Tom would say: "AIM high and keep some powder dry!"

Regards, Steve

[Conrad]

Hi Jack, (we are not going to Cuba)

I thought that Euler's formula had something to do with structural engineering.

Well, I thought Euler had something to do everything but he may have missed a thing or two. He even made up a number for himself, which he bequeathed to us mortals after he left for greener pastures, maybe to count some digits:

e = 2.7182 8182 8459 0452 3536 0287 4713 5266 2497 7572 4709 3699 9595 7496 6967 6277 2407 6630 3535 4759 4571 3821 7852 5166 4274 2746 6391 9320 0305 9921 8174 1359 6629 0435 7290 0334. . .

and still counting. I think that is the most insanely irrational thing to do.

If the number works for fine for building bridges think what it might do for the AIM-structure!

:-)

I always claimed that with an AIM structure the money grows, or decays, exponentially. Thanks to Euler we can prove it!