InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rebtevyah

04/06/07 1:15 PM

#241923 RE: tomm11701 #241921

TOMMI-OH Yeah, you're just full of common sense-Posted by: tomm11701
In reply to: Z-Axis who wrote msg# 232670 Date:2/2/2007 OH10:16:39 AM
Post #of 241922

My post on RB:
Kerouact, thanks for turning me on to CKYS. Looks really promising. I don't know much about pink sheets, but the stock has the potential for good spikes, which, in turn, means bucks made. The preemption notwithstanding, the PRs from that company are awesome. Also, the company appears profitable (there is some debt, though) and there appears to be no reason for that not to grow. The sad part is that it shows clearly what the problem with G is. Profits are negated by questionable expenses (consultation fees, etc.) so that the bottom line each Q is a huge and increasing loss. If this does not stop, G might be viewed as a scam, with them earning their bucks by stripping the company. Any thoughts?

icon url

xanadu

04/06/07 1:42 PM

#241931 RE: tomm11701 #241921

With 9 million of assets can't quite see where you come up with "only worth 3 million"?

Oh, I see, talking about marketcap, not assets. Well, marketcap is just under 5 million right now, still greatly undervalued with assets of 9 million.