Replies to post #9602 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[bag8ger]

Thanks Mingwan0 and NikLinna,

It's clear I don't understand the new theory yet, but I want to. And this board is a good place to be to do it.

[mingwan0]

Let's go back to one of the paragraphs in the article:

"The Principle attributes coding- and non-coding DNA a mutually supportive role in which neither is inferior to the other, thereby changing Genomics from a fishing expedition for fewer and fewer genes into an Information Challenge of colossal proportions to decipher the genetic code in which both "coding" and "non-coding" DNA play an essential part."

According to the principle it is not a case of coding DNA interpreting non-coding DNA, as both are involved in a dualistic (contravariant to borrow a technical term from the article) role. Hence the additional complexity leading to a "challenge of colossal proportions".

[trader guy]

NikLinna, you appear to be using the same logic as employed in this post:

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1833361

Lol. Have a good one,
Iom