News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stockmjb22

03/29/07 9:31 AM

#69492 RE: tradeforyourlife #69491

trade, so why weren't they working on anything then??? Three months and nothing to show for it. Someone contact Bleckman and see his take on this............
icon url

db_ill_invest

03/29/07 9:32 AM

#69493 RE: tradeforyourlife #69491

It could be that the expenses of auditing GTEM back to the adgi conversion that the SEC would require might be too big and expensive a task for a businessman to justify for a move to the BB and to try and salvage the tarnished reputation of GTEM/GTE/GTEL and face more attacks (BONY error, hack journalists, etc). I hope the Ks will just sell everything at this point.
icon url

rwehapi2003

03/29/07 9:44 AM

#69498 RE: tradeforyourlife #69491

trade, I find it hard to believe too, but the PR states "performed no work for the company".

Maybe they were just brought in for show? The GTEM audit committee dismissed Dohan so they had to keep appearances by appointing another company?

The point of my previous post was to state that, barring turning off the lights, GTEM is a pinksheet company now and we should maybe forget about any past and future financial reporting since it is not required of a pinksheet company. As much as we would like to see what is going on under the hood, Khoury may have made the decision that this GTEM is not for public viewing. Their silence on financial matters certainly indicates that.
icon url

nerd86

03/29/07 1:27 PM

#69568 RE: tradeforyourlife #69491

tradefor what liability, it didn't happen on their shift. all they need to do is verify the accuracy of the numbers put together by the internal audit. You can look at the fear of not getting paid as a real option. I am flabergasted that the company went as long as it did on the cash that it had and could generate from operations.