Glow. There is no reason to get personal about this..we are all in the same boat.
You are correct, it is my opinion.
Yet, as positive as you might want to hope to spin this email, how does that square with the "capital issue" email referenced earlier...that I do not think you addressed?
The point I am trying to make is simple.
Until management directly and unquestionably and unambiguously directly addresses our exact status on all of these fronts, I now and have for some time now, view all exchanges with IR as calculated and purposeful 'stalls', 'Holds', 'hang in there' type of responses.
Just enough chum to keep us nibblin'. But also full of CYA stuff or 'iffy' to keep the lawyers at bay.
That is his job. And further more, I do not think he is privy to the everything that is going on.
Again, I will say, the fact we still have an IR Director employed as a Pink stock cutting the heck out of expenses, should be viewed as a very positive sign. Amazing as Rob was at one time viewed by some serious posters here as a non-worthy hire.
m