News Focus
News Focus
icon url

janice shell

03/19/07 7:17 PM

#254616 RE: cm3i long termer #254614

And what gave them the right to gift themselves with all that stock? Without even mentioning it to shareholders? Not to mention the SEC.
icon url

MrGoodBuddy

03/19/07 7:18 PM

#254617 RE: cm3i long termer #254614

Charlie you are correct, none of us are judge and jury. The OSC is not comprised of a jury either.

Do as you say, not as you do.

icon url

boogaloo

03/19/07 7:35 PM

#254623 RE: cm3i long termer #254614

cm3i, Ok, I'll follow your logic for a moment. Hang with me on this...

So, we don't know where all the shares came from... true.

But answer me this... did the company promise not to increase the OS beyond 500mm? Yes or no?

Was the company also touting the fact that there was a large restricted share lot (of the 500mm OS)? Yes or no?

Did the OS increase to 700+mm (or 600+mm, I forget)?? Yes or no?

Did the float turn out to be the SAME as the OS which went up by a large %?? Yes or no?

So, what do you deduce from that? That nominees, insiders, et al, dumped at least a hundred million shares??? Yes or no?

Your answers to my questions is appreciated. TIA
icon url

EarnestDD

03/19/07 7:41 PM

#254627 RE: cm3i long termer #254614

You say that you will let the courts decide.

Will you believe the Ontario Securities Commissions ruling and make your posting consistent with that ruling?

imo