So, per your definition of investing, "buying a stock and holding it", when you bought BIEL stock and flipped it several weeks later that was not investing because you did not 'hold it'???
That was not investing in BIEL. When KW and RS screwed shareholders by converting at 50% and dumping, they were "investing" their money to profit, but you said they invested in BIEL, and that is bullshit.
The idea that " Without that dumping, BIEL would be worth more today." is absurd.
Why? If they had kept the loans instead of converting the O/S would be much lower, making BIEL shares worth more; and if they had converted but held instead of dumped, investors would see that insiders are holding, creating the perception that BIEL stock has value. THAT would be investing in BIEL. But when they dumped before the ink on the new shares was dry, they sent a different message: they didn't think it's smart to hold BIEL stock, and today they still don't. Which begs the question: why should anyone else think it's smart to hold BIEL stock?
You're just pretending to be thick, aren't you. For what purpose?