News Focus
News Focus
icon url

norisknorewards

05/13/26 3:51 PM

#825970 RE: brazen22 #825965

"But her appointment does not prove approval is close"

dude, we get it, you have a short position, you want us all to think a decision is months and years and decades away so we can help your short position.

NEXT!!!
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

barnstormer

05/13/26 4:01 PM

#825972 RE: brazen22 #825965

Brazen, Flaskworks remains a black box. Reminds me of Churchill's comment regarding Russia, " It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma". Hard to be considered anything else when you consider that its status given during the 2026 ASM appears to be lifted word for word from the company's 2/6/2024 PR. Are we led to believe over the best part of 2 years there has been no progress?
icon url

Doc logic

05/13/26 4:38 PM

#825979 RE: brazen22 #825965

brazen22,

Your post mentioned seeking proof that you are now correcting to seeking evidence. That evidence you ask for that has never been shared? How about the reason for the halt?; ). That might answer a lot of questions that haven’t already been answered but I have seen enough evidence and know enough about the process to be absolutely certain about the conclusion I have drawn about what that was all about. We have been waiting on verifiable manufacturing transition for quite a long time in my opinion. I reiterate “manufacturing, manufacturing, manufacturing”. Not all will agree and that’s what makes a market right?; ). Best wishes.
icon url

pqr

05/13/26 6:01 PM

#825998 RE: brazen22 #825965

Brazen again i need to correct your fud.  Your statement that the Jenkins hire implies that the company has material information THST IT IS (or may be) OBLIGATED TO DISCLOSE is wrong and you know it.  Of course the company has reams and years of material information that it has not disclosed.  That’s why insiders can’t trade right now.  But that doesn’t support your claim that it cannot act on that information by, for example, making business decisions.  Your suggestion to the contrary is of course ridiculous.  AnMAA applicant should ignore its own submissions, interactions with MHRA, etc from the day the application is filed until it is acted upon?   Please be serious.