News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BIOChecker4

05/07/26 3:58 PM

#518101 RE: Steady_T #518100

Yesterday I posted the section of Missling’s employment agreement (publicly available) that talks about reasons he could be fired for cause. Obviously we do not know specifics (at least not yet) but all of them are quite serious.
icon url

Investor2014

05/07/26 4:14 PM

#518104 RE: Steady_T #518100

So you are still hopeful it was 'just' sexual misconduct and still see a silver lining and eventually a $6,000 share price?
icon url

poguemahone

05/07/26 4:34 PM

#518109 RE: Steady_T #518100

My reference to Anavex being “radioactive” was merely to point out that given a choice, the FDA would probably prefer to not deal with a company that just fired their CEO for cause. It casts a cloud over things until the new management team can reassure the investment community and other stakeholders what the damage was—and what the future prospects are.

We really don’t know these answers until we hear from the new leadership—the sooner, the better.

Don’t get upset with me—I have nothing to do with the predicament we are in, other than being an unfortunate shareholder like many on this board. I was hoping to be wrong about Missling, but sadly I wasn’t.

My mother always told me, if someone shows you over and over again who they are—believe them. Missling’s repetitive behavior of being aloof, arrogant, poorly-spoken, and obtuse were huge hints at the train wreck he really was. This man had no business being a leader of a lemonade stand—no less a Nasdaq biotechnology company. Shame on this BOD for not recognizing this a lot sooner.