You could be right and I would welcome a deal. However, there’s no need for an interim ceo to make a deal. The board could do it. And there would be no need for a ceo letter laying out what seems like the start of a plan to build a team and run trials. I hope they do it with a partner. Since there is no clear successor, interim is the better move now especially that she doesn’t have ceo experience. Let see. Change is good. There’s deep value in the pipeline. FWIW. I don’t believe Missling is a fraudster. He may be hyperbolic but not a criminal. Staying on the board and getting fired as opposed to resigning get him unemployment benefits and leverage if further investigation proceeds.