News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Philoctetes

05/05/26 4:21 PM

#79889 RE: Skygazer16447 #79888

Is that you, Kyle?
icon url

Raider21

05/05/26 5:37 PM

#79891 RE: Skygazer16447 #79888

Just who are you. The master excuse spinner?

What a crock of bull - you know what.
icon url

hedge_fun

05/05/26 5:43 PM

#79892 RE: Skygazer16447 #79888

I thought they were coring holes, not recovering….

artifacts and cataloging them.

Wasn’t the point of Timmy’s Toy cutting thru all the red tape and simply pinpointing treasure?

Regardless, if what you’re saying is true Kyle should explain to shareholders why verifying and PROVING TO THE WORLD the device works isn’t a priority.

Also, what do you mean more silver?

As far as items belonging to Spain, Juno is grandfathered and the wreck belongs solely to SFRX. The big ole ballast pile belongs to them, along with the anchor.

Further, to your military vessel vs merchant vessel theory often regurgitated by Kyle, there’s no such thing. If it was Spain’s cargo they remain the owner unless they relinquish it. But again, Juno is grandfathered and that doesn’t apply to wrecks where title has been awarded.

And welcome to Ihub.
icon url

hedge_fun

05/12/26 8:04 AM

#79960 RE: Skygazer16447 #79888

I think everyone is a little impatient. Corps of Engineers requires all items of archeological concern be catalogued and described - even a shard of pottery. Just to get to possible items that will be of considerable value will take months and months of archeological work.

Relax - this could take years.



I certainly expect nothing less than years. It’s been over 2 years since they got the permit.

Zip, zero, nada!

Happy TACO Tuesday Einstein!