Agreed. Let's hope the SC accepts that this case is about Amarin’s complaint being sufficient to plead a plausible claim, and had pled enough in its complaint to survive a motion to dismiss, overturning the district court’s decision. It is NOT about whether Hikma is liable or not. That's for the lower court to decide.
Although the Justices seemed to question the details of the case (such as, was the reference material simply used to offer to investors), I also believe that they will side with Amarin and allow the case to remand for trial.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
