“full wind”? - Is an attorney one of the “some people” you’ve spoken to? I bet not.
Marshall flipping 50,000,000 shares, or 66,199,283 shares, is not illegal.
And we don’t know it’s not a reporting error on his company’s Annual Report filing.
You tease proof of illegalities, yet you won’t put forward your claim?
Ummmm bro…
And yet even so, the SEC will cancel his Reg-A, you claim. Seems like your standard hot air.
(you did lie to everyone that you purchased 20% of MDCE outstanding).
Or… deliver already.
____
The potential illegality that I determine is Kaplan’s violation (if established) of Rule 144.
As a 65.2% owner of MDCE and no affiliate letter issued by Kaplan to the transfer agent or his or the company’s attorney, or to the SEC or to the market makers, the SEC likely can conclude Kaplan’s position and arrangement with Marshall Perkins amounts to Kaplan’s control (direct influence) over Medical Care Technologies, Inc. and it’s MDCE stock, which then establishes Kaplan as a controlling 10% or greater owning insider, which as/if concluded makes Kaplan’s sales of MDCE stock impermissible.
If Kaplan and Marshall plan to rinse n repeat on Reg-A #2, then yes, the SEC may prevent to cancel Reg-A #2.
Rule 144 seems to be over everyone’s head and understanding here.
.
Market Data 
Markets 
