Do you know how (sorry I can’t use the word ignorant, because that would excuse you ) stupid that opinion sounds?
It would be the equivalent of me telling you, based on your alias and opinions to get your brains out of the litter box. So I won’t.
And while you are at it. Learn the difference between a negative bias or a bias of any kind and the performances pushed out from LQMT since LL took over. I will spare you going back to 2002.
Try to put a positive on that and you would no what the definition of bias really means.
I would be disingenuous if I put a negative bias on the performance from LQMT. The 10k’s the share price and the trading volumes and liquidity are negative enough. Not to mention three insignificant customer orders and zeros new 8K part orders and seldom progress updates of any kind. You want to sugar coat it? Deceive someone. Not me.
You tell me what raised the share price from 0.04 to 0.14 cents in two weeks. A contract or a rumor?
You tell me why it hit 0.16 cents. A new facility of potential, with FOMO or a contract.
I think I stated it very clearly and without bias one way or the other. The only positive thing LQMT has been good at is selling their IP and potential.
As obstinate as Almost is, I am not certain, but I think, maybe you found a second view point we both can agree on. The first point is we both have expressed the desire in our own words for LQMT to succeed.
What’ happened ? Too many shares traded for you today?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
