Apple’s problems are not the reason LQMT has two executives, both educated, who can’t sell Lemmon aid to people lost and thirsty in the Mojave Desert.
Whether Apple, has issues, they will survive. So far ( 0%) none of their income comes from a successful foldable hinge in any of their products. While (100%) all of LQMT’s product revenues come from insignificant contracts for revenue.
Apple’s hinge issues are a problem for those suppliers and manufacturers of the hinge. In no way is LQMT either one.
The only issue with those facts or rumors might be for those who invest with a mindset of living in la la land or somewhere in the mythical land of Oz.
LQMT determines it’s own fate by what it does by it’s own failures to sell and not by others and by it’s leadership making either good choices or bad choices and the sad part is they have not had alcohol problems to make the bad one’s.
The effects of Apple having issues with a hinge only impacts and lends an excuse for LQMT to delay its unproven potential to earn money off of their other endeavors. It does not in anyway excuse them from having more contracts on their existing endeavors for which Apple has (0%) zero percent influence.
The implication you make about Applle’s use of Liquidmetal is as old as the botched agreement back in 2010. It does not exonerate LQMT for not having more than three to five major customers at any one time over its existence!
My advice, not that you woud ever ask is to…Stay focused on LQMT, and skip the noise, skip the distractions and trap that so many others have fallen into.
I wish people would stop using other companies as excuses for LQMT’s own continued executive failures and put the blame for its situation squarely on them. PERIOD!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
