Permit me to post the reply to you again. Since you haven’t read it. Or don’t understand it.
Obviously you interpret the share price of 0.097 and not being above 19 cents for many years now as a positive and I interpret that as a negative. There are many other negatives I can cite but each negative that is backed up by facts would only be seen by you as a positive. Like not having a new part order contract requiring an 8K in over 4 years. Like not producing continued growth in revenues in over 2 decades.
The only one here that has manipulated crap about LQMT and posters is actually you. No one here is posting 24/7. That is your first manipulation.
Your like an abused spouse in love with LQMT. Each time you get abused by their negative results you start apologizing for them and saying to yourself: No, no they didn’t mean to do it. They will do better next time. Each time they give you an end of year spiel. You set yourself up for the next disappointment and make another excuse for them. That is pathetic. You need help. You need some serious therapy for your delusional thinking and seeing LQMT going to the moon and leaving the train station and gloating over someone else’s bad timing year after year or misfortune year after year. Seriously!
Here is my original reply to your wondering mind about why I post the way I post. Read it this time and try to figure out why you hold onto LQMT. Because frankly you sound like one sorry azz investor who needs some serious sorry azz help!
I think I’ll repost it each time you make another dumb azz comment about posters and not voice an opinion positive or negative about LQMT!
Neurologist’s say that even people who have dementia and forget (not saying you have dementia) can re-learn by repetitive exercise.
————————————//—————————-
Your opinions of posters who have points of views based on reality for the most part and less on hype and speculation, seems to distracted you from your focus on LQMT and has caused you to focus more on the posters, rather than check the facts or see the conclusions of their results. Your love for carrying the water of LQMT, also, has blind sided you from giving an unbiased opinion.
Your posts, your words are proof of that. The few times that you are in sync with LQMT, is when they announce and release some sort of lame contract PR for parts over 4 years ago or when a rare rumor hits the web. Other than that your unconditional love for LQMT and Josh is admirable, where you used to carry his water too, and copy and pasted his fair opinions of where LQMT might be based on his research.
My personal life is my business. No, I am absolutely not paid by anyone. Like others here I am an investor, who has been retired now for more than two decades. I have been very lucky to have met decent financial advisors who have successfully invested for me through out my life. They do not invest in dice rolls. And once in a while doing very well on one or two of what others post. This is my only dice roll.
The views posted are very simple based on reality. Every single day for many years, months, weeks and days, LQMT has done squat by way of actually raising the shareholders value. Other than wash rinse and recycles bringing home the bacon, and the forever forward worded spiels of LQMT’s future expectations never matching their 10K results. It has been a challenge to still believe that the blind squirrel is going to find the nut that just fell from a tree.
I don’t disillusion myself with every rumor or 8k that LQMT is going to hit a dollar or more. All want LQMT to succeed. Can they succeed? If I did not think it were possible I would have sold along time ago. But in the interim I no longer share the same disconnect that you have for LQMT, every time they or someone else makes noise. When was the last time they hit a dollar and for how long? A sound bite came off of the internet? 16 years ago. It went up and if you blinked it was gone, a mirage.
It’s funny. You got a beef with people who are spot on about LQMT, almost 100% of the time in the past and present, but you don’t have a beef for someone who has been wrong almost 100% as well. It depicts a bias, intentionally closed minded, never serious. A phony. A king of bullshit.
You do have some excellent points of view imo, when you focus on LQMT. From your posts. You got hooked on the Apple rumors many years ago.
You never gave up on CE. It is what has permitted China, to expand and begin to grow the potential use of amorphous metals and cause competition for LL to keep in investing in R&D to develop a process that is more valuable than the patents to produce high volume manufacturing. That process can now benefit LQMT in every endeavor it can legally persue. So either way, whether LQMT collects a dime or a million dollars or zero, zilch, nada, directly from CE, they can still become successful off of CE.
I post to share ideas and facts of the past and present and the possibilities of a plausible future up or down unbiased and if they sound negative, it’s because that is what they have achieved. Not $1 dollar a share for umpteen years, FRICKEN PENNIES! Got it now?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
